Home Blog Page 34

Honors: To Take or Not To Take?

0

Kaycie Adams

This picture depicts the locker of a student who is in Humanities. 9 out of 17 of the books pictured here belong to the Humanities course for first semester. In contrast, the English 4 course has 3 novels that they read during 1 semester.

 

Senior year provides a scheduling dilemma for seniors who can’t decide between the two extremes of English classes.

     Senior year: a time for working hard and hardly working to prepare for college. Between choosing classes that you can easily handle, but also look appealing to colleges.

     To graduate high school, you are required to take 4 years of English classes. From freshman year to junior year, an option to take honors or higher level courses such as AP are offered.

     When you get to senior year, however, there are two options available at Mission Viejo High School: the Humanities course, and the college prep level, English 4 class. Unlike all previous years, a parent override can’t get you into the higher level classes.

     The Humanities class is a test-in only class unless you are enrolled in the International Baccalaureate program here at Mission Viejo High School. So now over half of the previous AP Literature students are now forced to go from an AP style course to a college prep level course, that often works at a slower pace.

     College prep level classes are great, and this article is not to shame those who take college prep level classes or display them as less than classes. However, in style and how the classes are run, it is very different than the AP style that a large number of students are used to.

     Mission Viejo High School is a school that is known for their strong academics and their AP and IB programs with a large portion of students participating in them, more than any other high school. Moving from a class that depended on preparing the whole year to take the test in May, students around the country all focused on the same exact concepts and used analysis of novels as tools to get them through the test at the end of the year.

     Sarah Smith is a senior here at Mission Viejo High School and states “I feel like I am wasting my time in a class where I am not being pushed to my greatest ability. And with going to college next year I want to be equipped with knowledge that will be helpful.”

     The lack of an Honors English 4 class not only impacts AP students who were placed in the regular English 4 class, but it also brings an issue for students who are joining Humanities simply because there is no other alternative. Abby Ross, a senior, claims that she took Humanities because “normal English is too easy and not fun.”

     This seems to be a common feeling among students. Daryan Ghaemi says, “I took Humanities because I was worried that I would be too bored in English 4, and I wanted colleges to see that I challenged myself as a senior.” Sophia Klueter agrees, saying “I felt that this class would prepare me for college better than English 4 would.”

     The consensus is that there are truly no middle grounds. It is not fair to expect students coming from the college prep classes to suddenly be at a higher level to keep the past AP kids interested, and it also isn’t fair to expect ex-AP kids to suddenly drop a level just because there isn’t a class offered to them at their level.

 

A Team Built to Succeed

0

Kendall McAlister
Staff Writer

Taken by Kendall McAlister

 The MVHS  girls cross country team is sure to dominate their division this year. As one of the top teams in the country, carrying an Under Armour sponsorship, and many talented runners, success isn’t too far away. On September 15, the team had its first meet at Woodbridge in Norco, CA, and varsity runners scored fourth overall against over 350 other schools.

    A day of practice for these competitive racers consists of a half a mile warm up to begin. Some runners will try to run it as fast as they can, but most stay at steady paces, talking with their friends as they run. After the jog, the runners will proceed to do “leg swings,” a way of stretching to prepare for the miles ahead. Since leg swings don’t take long, runners have time to get water, sit down, and talk with friends before the whole team is ready to go for a road run. On the road run, runners are encouraged to try their best, keep their pace, and improve overall. Road runs are extremely important to the training of the team, because they train for the distance, hills, and speed, while on the streets of Mission Viejo.

    Last year, the team had an opportunity to compete at Orange County Championships, a race where only the best schools can compete. Kelli Hines achieved a school record at the meet,with a time of 17:41. This year, the Mission Viejo team hopes to run an even better time. They will accomplish this by training on hills, running longer distances, and doing more workouts.

    An average race consists with runners arriving an hour or more early before they are ready to race. While they wait, they cheer on their teammates, warm up, stretch, and get familiar with the course they are about to run. After that, the runners take their place on the start line and arange to be in the best position possible. When they here they “Ready, set,” from the announcer they know they are about to start, and when the gun goes off, they sprint for as long as they can ,and fall back down to a steady pace.

    Since the team is well known for its success and great speeds at races, Under Armour has decided to sponsor the cross country team. The girls will get Under Armour uniforms at a discounted price, as well as free shirts, bags, and other items beneficial to the team.They will be sponsoring the team as well as many other top running schools to support the schools’ talented girls in a sport that isn’t too often recognized.

    The team is built for success, and nothing can stop them this year. They have more talented runners than ever, including freshman already qualified for varsity, seniors with amazing  talents, and a very strong junior varsity team. The coaches are trying to push the team more than ever to achieve success, and considering the scores from the last meet and the previous years, success is sure to be in their future.

 

Patriotic or Discriminatory?

0

Madelyn Novick

unnamed
Credit: Jeff Bishop (LA Times)

During Aliso Niguel High School’s patriotic 9/11 game against Santa Ana High School, offensive actions were expressed by Aliso students, making many question if the game truly was patriotic or racist.

      Like many schools, Aliso Niguel High School has their own version of a patriotic football game. They have their students dress in red, white and blue and other patriotic clothing along with some spirit posters, what is considered usual for a football game.

    However, here is when things get dicey. Some of the posters referenced President Trump, and with his name comes the connotative meaning of anti-immigrant and more specifically, anti-Latino sentiments due to his idea of the border wall and the separation of families after targeting only illegal immigrants of color, leaving many children traumatized beyond repair.

    Now consider the following: 99% of Santa Ana High School is Latino. Also, note that posters carried by students from a 56% white populated school in conservative Southern Orange County had racist remarks such as “We Love White” and “Build the Wall.”

    Santa Ana’s principal, Jeff Bishop was also very frustrated at the treatment he saw his students get. They were welcomed with said racist posters and other chants from the student section, and every touchdown from Aliso’s team led to screams of “USA.”

    Instagram user jade_killz made their own post, in which they describe other events at the game, claiming that more parents and students reported hearing Aliso students that ICE should have been at the game to check the players’ citizenship papers and that the students were “cockroaches” and “disgusting immigrants.”

    Bishop, on that topic, said that they “…were not playing against Germany or Mexico. They were playing my kids, 22 minutes down the freeway.”

    After finding Aliso’s principle Deni Christensen and explaining what he had witnessed, she and her assistant principals set out to confiscate the posters and stop the chants whenever they were heard.

    After that, the game went back to being about the sport instead of promoting racial and political agendas. Bishop then posted about the experience online after the game, inciting people to claim that Aliso should have forfeited their win.

    The Monday after the game, September 10th, Christensen then posted her own rebuttal. She had a completely different perspective on the event.

    Christensen claimed that the game was only supposed to be patriotic, making the chants of “USA” appear valid, which is understandable under that pretense. She also claimed that no one on her staff witnessed overt racism, despite what the posters said.

    Christensen also claimed she was saddened by those calling her students and her school racist, as she did not see it that way. She still stands by her claim that it was all in the name of patriotism for the 9/11 memorial game.

    Her response has received lots of backlash, as many believe that her student’s actions were blatantly racist. She stated that it’s a matter of perception, which incited more backlash, as people are viewing it as a white woman deciding what is racist to a person of color.

    Christensen’s response conflicting with Bishop’s also adds more controversy, as it can be perceived as a defense against racist actions along with the toleration of it, which is also not appropriate from a school official.

    Kaycie Adams, the center editor of the Diablo Dispatch, had this to say: “I believe that as a principal, she should take charge of her school, realize the mistake they made, and apologize.”

    In regard to Aliso winning the game, many have called for them to forfeit the win due to the insults hurled at players, ruining any possibility of the win being fair or justified as they were being degraded while they were playing.

 

August SAT Leaked: What This Means for Students

0

Kobe Vergara
Staff Writer

Credit: see.news

After many students prepared over the summer to take the August 25 SAT, it was later found out that it was a recycled test, already taken by overseas students.

     Once the SAT finished all over the US, many students began to hear about rumors of the exam being a recycled exam from Asia. This caused an uproar as many students felt that some gained an unfair advantage versus other students.

    News came out from various tweets and posts on social media. Many of the posts asked if College Board was aware that the test they gave was a previous test given in China and South Korea.

    Furthermore, the actual test itself and its answer key were posted from various sources on Chinese websites. Even more surprising is that they were posted months before the actual SAT.

    This caused great controversy as it allowed for those overseas students to have an unfair advantage. For example, students took practice tests in order to prepare for the exam, which included previous tests from past years.

    While College Board does release previous tests for their Question and Answer service, they only release the May international exams. For this, the October 2017 international exam was not supposed to come out for public use.

    Many international students who take their test in Asia come to the US to take the exam again, in order to get another chance at the test.

    Students who took the international October 2017 SAT saw the same exam again. Some students on Twitter tweeted that they had seen the questions and the test before.

    However, there was also the argument that no one knew that questions from the older exam would be on the August 25 test. No one was actually able to predict questions on the exam. It was only after everyone completed the exam that some students recognized the test and were able to share about its reuse.

    While it is  normal for College Board to recycle old questions for their new exams, many are angered that College Board decided to recycle a whole exam. Students believe that for the amount of money and time they spend preparing for the test, that College Board should be able to provide fair tests.

    Once the College Board was notified that the exam was leaked, students again felt uneasy due to their fear of the exam being cancelled. This would again be another controversy as students felt divided on the issue.

    While some students believed it was College Board’s duty to cancel the test due to unfair advantage, others did not want their final SAT test to be canceled.

    Some of these students include seniors, as they have to apply to college soon and do not have time to take another SAT, or those students who spent their whole summer studying for this exam.

    College Board’s response to the incident stated that they would cancel any person’s score if they were believed to be cheating, and ban them further College Board tests.While this response may seem drastic, many students were still able to receive their scores in the end, while some reported of delayed scores.

    While many students were still able to receive their scores, this incident brought up the issue of College Board reusing tests. With one of their biggest claims being that every student has a fair advantage, they must live up to their claims in the future.